anonymoususer987876


if i wanted to read about religion (which i don’t) then i would go visit the religion and spirituality category. (which i wouldn’t)

so give me a yes or no…
do you think religious topics belong in philosophy?

bunkushbunkush


Like , for instance, if Religion and Science were two humans, what would their greatest problem in dealing with each other be?

Jim F


Religion has been guilty of criticizing with Morality & Ethics. Defining right & wrong is a necessary part of life. As an ‘individual’ we have to decide for ourselves what that is. As long as we do not do it at the expense of others. Morality & Ethics is more about not living selfishly. So, who gets to decide what right and wrong is? If we all decide and come up with differant answers there will be a lot of chaos.

Somebody Real


I disagree with it personally, but I am being opened minded as far as how good your agrument is. It just seems strange that one text is interpreted in so many ways and each one is solitarily right. I say that people are intended to interpret religion in their own way rather than that of an institution.
No war? People are too greed-ridden to be able to do that. Land, power, pride, and other wealth have been the source of many wars. I doubt religion did anything, but make the war seem more humanely justified.
scratch that “humanely” bit.

johnmathers12


For example, much art, music, poetry, and philosophy are biproducts of organized religion.

So what do you think? Was religion a necessary evil? Are we almost ready to finally cast the chains aside?

hasan yahya


Religions and the Muslim Philosophy!

By: H.A. Yahya, Professor of Sociology

It never came to my mind to stand against the basic beliefs of the religions of God.  The different and changing testimonies of the followers of these religions make me defend philosophy in the face of  practiced religions of the world. It is my position, that if a certain religion promotes hatred of other religions or beliefs,  is not a religion. And therefore, it should be attacked on the basis of justice. If  the laws of each religion justify hatred of other religions, then it should be understood, that my actions are also, justified.

Philosophically speaking,  mind is the basic ingredient of human differentiate him from animal, and therefore, human should use their minds to promote happiness in life Not in the unseen life. Reality described by philosophers through the separation of Spirit and Body. While spirit cannot be defeated or demolished completely, as we know,  the body is limited by age. Age is limited by years, but soul is not limited by years.

Mind should be the strong castle of human to defend superstitious ideas and metaphysical phenomena. Limitation of human mind is combined with limitation of humans’ age on earth. Other humans may continue using the mind to continue the march toward unfolding knowledge about the Universe. But one human cannot do so. The works of old philosopher are leading but not completing the modern human mind. Socrat,  Galileo, Christ, and Pain and many others were excluded  from their communities and paid their lives for what they believe in. Their intuition was leading humans to use their minds for the purpose of having happy life, by applying the logic of this life at its best.

Religion and Time: The majority of the ignorant theology, and the powerful authority in the absence of logic have lost in historical events, the essence of human existence on Earth. Even in these days of 2008, the world still governed by the majority ignorant or the powerful authority who believe that war for example, is the only way to protect the self or the  nation’s interest. Unfortunately, the knowledge obtained so far, about the world was used to destroy it. Or to destroy human happiness. We know that values are changing, the good of the past is no more good in present .  Values of the rich is very much different from the poor values.  And values of ignorant people are different from those of well advanced in knowledge.

Human Being is no more living for their family, wife, and kids, They are working for their own pleasures. Money is no more serving the purpose of basic needs, it becomes numbers like human beings. Numbers without feelings, without minds, without souls. Money should not be an end by itself, but a means to survive and serve those who need it. Look for the Oil producing countries, how they are fooled by oil companies. Oil is contributing in the world misery of millions of people in poor countries around the world including the countries producing or consuming oil.  In the poor countries, war between religious sects is inevitable, and in the rich countries, the distance between poor and rich is sky rocketing.  So you might ask, what is the solution for the world to come to mind?

This is a good question, and it makes anyone-including myself-nervous. But to be nervous, is not the right way to answer the question. The question, anyhow, is part of the answer. The terms used in the question, how? Read it again, we may replace the first term (what?) in the question by the last term (mind) to become, “mind is the solution for the world to come to.” As you see, the solution  is using the mind. Not emotions or feelings or faiths. It is simply the mind which lead us to understand ourselves, to understand  our environmental surroundings, the nature, and the creatures in it. Is this hard to grasp or comprehend ? I did not think so.  In the case of religions, if Jews, Christians, Muslims or any other faith followers use their minds to solve their problems, especially in Palestine, sure they will be able to reach a conflict-free world all over. (709 words)

 

Jim F


Religion has been guilty of criticizing with Morality & Ethics. Defining right & wrong is a necessary part of life. As an ‘individual’ we have to decide for ourselves what that is. As long as we do not do it at the expense of others. Morality & Ethics is more about not living selfishly. So, who gets to decide what right and wrong is? If we all decide and come up with differant answers there will be a lot of chaos.

Somebody Real


I disagree with it personally, but I am being opened minded as far as how good your agrument is. It just seems strange that one text is interpreted in so many ways and each one is solitarily right. I say that people are intended to interpret religion in their own way rather than that of an institution.
No war? People are too greed-ridden to be able to do that. Land, power, pride, and other wealth have been the source of many wars. I doubt religion did anything, but make the war seem more humanely justified.
scratch that “humanely” bit.

johnmathers12


For example, much art, music, poetry, and philosophy are biproducts of organized religion.

So what do you think? Was religion a necessary evil? Are we almost ready to finally cast the chains aside?

John


Could that be the reason why it has such a profound effect on so many people?