dstan a asked:


How can I know scientificly Jesus is crucifixed and not still alive?

10 Responses to “How can I know scientificly Jesus is crucifixed and not still alive?”

1. no1home2day on October 30th, 2008 9:15 am

   Please clarify yourself. Your question, as it is currently worded, makes no sense.

2. Nothing is impossible with God on November 1st, 2008 11:01 am

   Once you tell us what “scientificly” is, we’ll be able to answer.

3. Apollo Justice on November 4th, 2008 10:40 am

   Even if he wasn’t people don’t tend to live for 2000 years. Just a point you should think about….

4. Hall of Skulls on November 7th, 2008 9:32 am

   Since he was stolen from Mithra, he never existed!

5. Boris on November 10th, 2008 7:54 pm

   Still alive? If you’d care to produce another 2000 year old man for comparison purposes, we can get down to brass tacks. Somehow, I doubt that’s going to happen.

6. Bibs on November 13th, 2008 11:29 am

   How can I know that Julius Caesar was stabed by Casius and Brutus and not still alive?

7. Oldgrump on November 16th, 2008 9:10 pm

   Well, considering that the time Christ was supposed to have lived was over 2000 years ago, I’d be pretty damned surprised if he was still alive, crucifixion or no crucifixion.

   Oh, and the word is “crucified” not “crucifxed”, muppet.

8. Black Avenger on November 17th, 2008 10:03 am

   You can’t.

   There’s nothing science can determine about Jesus whatsoever as no reliable information about this man exists. All we have are the religious propaganda documents which are so erroneous, propagandistic in nature, and full of confabulations that they must be summarily rejected. There is nothing helpful outside the Christian texts either and what exists like the passage in Josephus is a spurious add-on by some unknown editor.

   So, since science must have data pulled from observation, or it isn’t science, there’s no Jesus to observe, no eye-witnesses to cross-examine, no written records written by Jesus’ own hand. In a word: NADA.

   We have nothing reliable to go on, so while the average person can speculate themselves to death about what Jesus was and whether he rose from the dead [a concept belonging more properly to Horror Films] or not.

   I believe the basic story in the gospel minus the magic and stupidity is credible enough. We have an itinerant Galilean carpenter turned preacher, probably a married man with children who thinks himself or is convinced by others that he is the Messiah, and like Che Guevara gets a little revolution going, but not a very competent one, and while visiting Jerusalem, got into hot water with the Roman and Jewish authorities, was handed over to Pilate, tried, convicted and executed for insurrection.

   End of story.

   Jesus no more rose from the dead than my grandmother rose from her grave.

   But then my grandmother was not regarded as a God-woman or holy person and had a band of idiotic followers who were so zealous in promoting a faith, that outright lying seemed no problem to them.

   Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

   What hard evidence do we have to support the Christian version of events in Jesus’ life? NADA, ZILCH, NICHEGO, ZERO.

   Scientists can’t work with with nothing. Nor can the philosopher.

   The mystic can work with anything and from a mere rumour can fabricate the most ungodly system of occultism or religion.

9. F C on November 20th, 2008 9:11 pm

   You cannot know the mystery and depth and breadth with science. It takes a different part of your mind to understand

10. Jon L on November 21st, 2008 9:18 pm

    Um… really? Men don’t live for thousands of years… and real God’s don’t die from being nailed to a cross rofl.

    So your question is basically retarded.

Leave a Reply

Name

Email Address

Website